Archive for June, 2008

Jun 30 2008

And A LOOOOOONG Look at a Very Controversial New Treatment for Depression

Published by admin under Holy Sh*t!, Media, University Life

To follow up the previous two columns on controversial treatments for various illnesses, here is a long series of columns on a radical new treatment for depression.  It’s a kind of neurosurgery that directly stimulates the parts of the brain hypothesized to lead or contribute to depression.  As always, I’m worried about over-prescription of such a procedure prior to trying other approaches.

However, some people truly seem susceptible to “endogenous depression,” which essentially refers to a depression that starts, “from within.”  That is, it’s not a reaction to negative events in the past or present; it supposedly just “hits from out of the blue” and thus is not something you can really treat.  For instance, you can’t simply think differently about a stressful job situation or try to forget/get over a lover who just broke your heart.

This type of depression is still controversial, as those who claim it really does come from out of nowhere (or from within, i.e., it’s biologically produced) are usually the ones funded by drug companies.  And these researchers are of course the ones most motivated to conduct their research in a way that is more likely to overlook certain factors that could contradict the claims that there truly were no external precipitating/causal factors for the depression; or those who don’t look carefully enough at various aspects of the depressed person’s personality, emotional functioning, interpersonal style, and/or processing of internal thoughts/memories/states that could make them vulnerable to depression.

In other words, if they can claim not to be able to find any such factors that increase one’s risk to depression, then they can claim that it’s “biologically caused” and thus we need to treat it biologically: yes, with medication.  Again, this might be true for some people, but these researchers and drug companies severely over-state how many people fit into this category.

But please read this fascinating series for yourself (I know, it’s long; and as with the other recent newspaper articles, my deepest gratitude to my erstwhile newshound…):

Mending a broken mind

What does sadness sound like? ‘Cells firing five to 30 times per second,’ and making it stop is a matter of ‘location, location, location,’ says the surgeon leading a team of Canadian pioneers who are restoring the lives of the deeply depressed
CAROLYN ABRAHAM (Globe and Mail, June 27, 2008)

The first time I met Sean Miller, we were strangers waiting in a corridor at the outpatient psychiatry unit of Toronto General Hospital. He was the redhead, wearing a grey sweatshirt, jeans and a 100-watt smile. “Popular place,” he said.  He looked rosy and energized, as if he had been for a run. “Pretty warm out there today,” he added. He mentioned rain in the forecast and cracked a joke about the “nice weather” we had been having. Then a door opened down the hall and he waved goodbye – “See ya!”

A few minutes later, Peter Giaccobe, a 33-year-old psychiatrist, beckoned me to his office. “It’s fine,” he said. “You can come in.”  I had been waiting to observe Dr. Giaccobe’s 4 o’clock emergency appointment. Emergencies are routine in psychiatry. Patients turn up worried about a medication, feeling manic or fighting off suicidal thoughts.
But that May afternoon was something different: A 41-year-old patient had placed an urgent call to have his battery checked. His depression had been so severe that last year he allowed doctors to drill a hole in his head and thread two battery-powered electrodes down into his brain. The operation made him the 21st subject in one of the more radical mood-altering experiments on the medical books – a world-first, Canadian-led trial to treat depression with a procedure called deep brain stimulation.

The man had visited a lawyer friend at a courthouse, passed through a security check and later felt a downswing in his mood. Had the metal detector somehow short-circuited the electrodes in his head?  Dr Giaccobe opened his office door and that was the second time I met Sean Miller.
He laughed and tapped the top of his head. “Yeah, well, I was depressed – before this went in,” Mr. Miller said. “This thing saved my life.”

At a spitfire clip, he described the way he now bounds of out bed in the mornings, impatient for the day. “Before the operation, I wasn’t myself. … I love life, seriously love it, but I couldn’t think straight. I couldn’t work. I hardly left my apartment for four and a half years.”
“You’re the happiest person I’ve met all day,” I told him, and meant it.
“I know,” he beamed. “Isn’t that crazy?”
From the home front to the workplace, from the schools to the streets, mental illness presents one of the great challenges to modern society, a leading cause of disability, absenteeism and deaths due to suicide. Not only does it strike one in five Canadians, usually in their prime, but too often it defies the ability of modern medicine to treat it.
Depression, which affects one in 12 people in this country, is one of the trickiest disorders to cure. While 80 per cent of patients find effective relief with standard drug or psychotherapies, the latest numbers suggest that only 40 per cent truly feel well. Worse, experts estimate that, for 10 to 20 per cent of sufferers, nothing works.

To the shock of many, and the horror of some, the most promising treatment for intractable depression on the horizon is not a designer drug, a new form of talk or even genetic therapy. It’s electricity. The same force that powers our TVs and microwave ovens can lift the human spirit.
With deep brain stimulation (DBS), surgeons implant metal rods that aim steady pulses of electrical current at the faulty neural circuits believed to underlie mental illness. Spaghetti-thin, the rods connect to a cable that snakes invisibly down the neck to a cookie-sized, battery-operated regulator embedded just south of the collarbone.

DBS itself is not new. Doctors have used it to treat physical ailments for nearly 60 years, first to counter chronic pain and since the 1990s as a therapy for movement disorders. But society has long separated neurological diseases from psychiatric ones, as though physical conditions can stem from concrete malfunctions of the brain but maladies of the mind cannot.

Then in 2003, working with just six patients, University of Toronto researchers tested DBS on depression. It not only proved safe, it also made four of them better. Since then, 50 patients in Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal, as well as at least 30 in the United States, Europe and South America, have undergone the procedure in a bid to see whether electrical implants can indeed mend a broken mind.
The Toronto trial, open only to people whose depression has proved impervious to all other treatments, so far suggests that DBS is safe and offers lasting relief in more than half of all cases. The early results are encouraging enough that one manufacturer of the DBS device has already started down the road to have the U.S. Food and Drug Administration officially approve it for treating depression.
“The emerging picture seems to be that, if you can get better [with this], you can stay better,” says neurologist Helen Mayberg, whose work at the Baycrest Centre’s Rotman Research Institute in Toronto laid the groundwork for the DBS trial. Ivy League researchers in the U.S. are now investigating DBS as a treatment for obsessive compulsive disorder and, at Emory University in Atlanta, where Dr. Mayberg is now based, the target is type 2 bipolar disorder.
Shocking the brain to behave is hardly a revolutionary concept. Doctors first tried it in the 19th century, and in 1937, Italian researchers launched electroconvulsive therapy, zapping patients’ heads to induce seizures that sometimes improved symptoms, but also damaged memories and muscles. Even now, a gentler version of ECT remains an established, if controversial, treatment for a narrow range of severe mental disorders, depression in particular.

But the Toronto researchers point out that it’s not the use of electricity that makes their treatment a major advance – it’s where they put it. “With brain surgery, it’s like real estate – it’s location, location, location,” says Andres Lozano, the neurosurgeon and senior scientist who has led the trials at Toronto Western Hospital.

DBS offers a fresh opportunity to “de-stigmatize” mental illness, he says. If a mechanical device can regulate mood, then “behaviour is modulated by the same kind of circuitry. … People have no control over it. … They can’t just ‘pull up their socks.’ 

“There has been this distinction between neurology and psychiatry that’s artificial and arbitrary.”  But brain surgery for psychiatric conditions has a long, unhappy history – from head bashings in the Bronze Age to the 20th century’s infamous frontal lobotomy. After psychopharmaceuticals hit the market in the 1950s, cutting as a treatment for mental conditions became as unfashionable as Brylcreem. Which makes it all the more unlikely that any depression treatment involving drills and electrodes is making such an auspicious comeback.
“Some people say this is barbaric – One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest kind of stuff,” Dr. Lozano adds, but more than 40,000 Parkinson’s patients have already had DBS ease their tremors by targeting parts of the brain where motor neurons misbehave.
“People have no problem operating for Parkinson’s, but they have a problem operating for psychiatric conditions,” he says, adding that “we can go anywhere in the brain now. We can turn it up, we can turn it down …. regulating it, just like a thermostat.”
The only difference in using DBS for depression is that the electrodes target the brain area where sadness lives.

‘I LITERALLY FELL APART’
A few weeks after we met at Toronto General, Sean Miller sits in a Yorkville café. He downs a bottle of water and shrugs – nothing from his childhood predicted his long spiral into despair, he say.

He had grown up happy in Toronto’s tony Rosedale, the second of three children in a warm, supportive family. His father ran an import-export business. His mother, a former social worker, stayed home to raise the kids. He had close friends, attended good schools, flitted off to camp every summer, skied, played tennis and flirted with serious hockey.

He faced his only obstacle at 14, when he developed Guillain-Barré Syndrome, an autoimmune disorder that temporarily paralyzed him. He spent a year in rehab centres. When he returned to school, with a dropped foot and an awkward gait, he could no longer play hockey. Even so, he says, “I felt frustration and anger, but not depression.”

He did his last year of high school in the south of France, graduated from university to an exciting film industry job and landed a serious girlfriend. Life was grand.

But at 24 he had his first bout of depression. It was mild, but left behind a sense of “joylessness … purposelessness.” A psychiatrist prescribed an antidepressant but he found the libido-killing side effects too much to bear. He quit the medication after a year.

The next episode, at 27, was tougher to beat. He left his girlfriend and his job and flew to Thailand for an indefinite stretch of travel. While there, he started smoking dope, which he suspects “changed the depression from feeling low to something based on fear and anxiety.”

He returned home, resumed medication and, eventually, went back to work.

In a bid to avoid a relapse, he regularly attended 10-day meditation retreats, trying to train his mind “to stop the stream of negative thoughts.” He even volunteered to help others stay positive, answering the phones at a distress centre.

He remained well into his early 30s, climbed corporate ladders in sales and marketing and became involved in another serious relationship. Then, once again, he stopped taking the medication.

“I know, it was crazy,” he says, laughing now at what he did. “The side effects bothered me – but also, I was kind of a health-conscious guy and I didn’t want to take drugs.”

But at 36 his depression returned and this time, the third time, the drugs proved powerless. “I literally fell apart. The next four years were the worst of my life.”

Most friends stood by him. His girlfriend at the time rarely left his side. “But there were a few, who would be like, ‘Sean, get a job …. get a life … get your ass out of bed.’ I didn’t even feel like I was a part of life,” he says. “It felt like being buried alive.”

WELCOME TO AREA 25

Sadness lives behind the eyeballs, four centimetres back in from the forehead. That’s where Dr. Mayberg found it after 20 years of brain-imaging studies, in Boston, Texas and then Toronto in the late 1990s.

The pictures showed that a patch of the prefrontal cortex known as Brodmann Area 25 flicked into high gear when healthy subjects were made to feel sad, for example, by reading a personal essay about losing a loved one. At the same time, significant swatches of the subjects’ frontal cortex, the brain’s chief executive officer – its motivator and decision-maker – powered down. When their minds moved away from sad thoughts, the cycle reversed. Activity shut down in Area 25 and shot up in the frontal lobes.

But in patients with depression, the cycle never shifted. The lights at Area 25 were always on, stuck in a constantly active mode, compromising cognition in the frontal cortex.

Sitting in the ancient limbic lobe passed down from our slithering ancestors, Area 25 connects to the brain structures involved in human function – emotion, memory, stress, sleep, libido, appetite, energy levels and learning. “It’s linked into all the core areas involved in depression,” Dr. Mayberg says.

The images led to a hypothesis: If they had found one of the sites where a feeling runs amok, could they find a way to fix it? Would the type of DBS used for Parkinson’s charge the cells in Area 25 out of their “on” position?

In 2001, in a moment of serendipity, Dr. Mayberg met Dr. Lozano at a conference of neurosurgeons.

Dr. Lozano was world renowned for his brain-stimulation operations. He had performed DBS for Parkinson’s and other neurological disorders since 1992 – about six times a month. When Dr. Mayberg suggested that they try it for depression, he thought it was “a long shot” – but right up his alley. “I don’t want to do the ordinary, the routine, the established,” he says. “I’m not a fan of incrementalism. I just want to take big steps.”

A HOLE IN THE HEAD

In the spring of 2006, in the grip of depression in his downtown apartment, Mr. Miller watched a television segment on the DBS procedure. His mother had called to tell him to tune in.

By that point, he had burned through 20 types of antidepressants, five months of cognitive therapy and four rounds of ECT. He had been admitted to hospital three times for two-week stretches. He had tried meditation, acupuncture, vitamin regimens and a shop’s worth of naturopathic remedies. He had changed his diet and stopped eating dairy. His parents had even spent $4,000 so he could undergo transcranial magnetic stimulation, an experimental treatment that uses rapidly changing magnetic fields to alter the brain’s circuitry. None of it helped.

“I was suicidal every single day,” he recalls, “but I was scared shitless to die too.”

On the Internet, he researched painless ways to kill himself and wrote a suicide note in the event he could ever bring himself to do it. It told family and friends there was nothing anyone could have done, that he loved them and that he was sorry.

Until he saw the DBS segment, he did not hold out a glimmer of hope that he could ever recover. The patient featured was just like him. She had tried everything and everything had failed. Then, after doctors turned on those electrodes, she finally emerged from her long black fog.

As radical as brain surgery seemed, Mr. Miller knew instantly that he wanted to be a test subject. Having been paralyzed as a teen, he had often thought of tradeoffs he would be willing to make to be free of the anguish. “I used to lie there and think, ‘I’d give up an arm, or a leg, or both my legs … I would take paralysis over depression any day of the week.’ ”

Fear, he says, drove him to seek DBS. “It wasn’t having the guts to do it – it was what would happen if I didn’t do it.”

Having a hole drilled in his head seemed a small sacrifice.

‘MY LEGS ARE ON FIRE’

On a May morning in operating room No. 6, Dr. Lozano peers down at a patch of scalp, shaved and stained rusty red with iodine. He picks up a blade, cuts a square and tugs back the flap of flesh.

“Okay, John, you’re going to hear some noise now. It sounds like an air gun at Canadian Tire, the type they use to take the nuts off your tires,” he says, powering up the drill.

It takes two minutes to pierce a stubborn centimetre of cranium and bore a hole the size of a nickel. A nurse asks if the patient feels okay. He gives her a thumbs up.

Patient John McCutcheon, 38, doesn’t have a mental disorder, but he is still a pioneer – just the second person with multiple sclerosis ever to undergo DBS in a bid to ease the phantom-like pain in legs he can hardly feel.

“I’ve woken up dreaming my legs are on fire,” he told Dr. Lozano before the surgery began.

“What is it on a scale of 1 to 10?” Dr. Lozano asked.

“10-plus.”

Mr. McCutcheon’s head has been immobilized by a thorny titanium crown screwed into his skull. A chrome cradle grips his neck like a pipe in a vice. The probe that will slide through the hole in his skull sits locked in an arced frame that stretches over his head like a steel rainbow. The entire contraption makes him look part person, part metal, and wide awake – as he must be, to tell the surgeon what he feels as the probe plunges 8.5 centimetres into his brain.

First, it will journey to Mr. McCutcheon’s thalamus, to explore the rebel neurons scorching his lifeless legs. The sensory circuits near the midbrain will be the second destination, as the probe confirms exactly where the electrodes should go.

But for Dr. Lozano, every DBS procedure is about more than implanting electrodes – it’s an opportunity. Every dive beneath the brain’s glistening folds is a chance to glean its secrets, and often he has.

He discovered how neurons that once governed limbs that are now gone can misbehave to cause phantom pain, or take up new jobs to control other body parts. He found mirror neurons, the cells responsible for empathic pain, which can make you close your eyes or turn away when someone gets a needle. In January, while operating on an obese patient, he stimulated part of the brain that controls appetite and came across a crucial new area involved in memory. Expected to talk about food urges, the man instead vividly recalled a date he had had in a park more than 20 years ago … right down to what he and she were wearing.

As a result, Dr. Lozano has launched a pilot study to see whether DBS can improve the memory of early Alzheimer’s patients. In the process, the Spanish-born neurosurgeon – whose fit, six-foot-plus frame seems to tower over everything – has become a celebrity scientist at 49 (the hospital’s public-relations director calls him the resident rock star), featured in The New York Times, The Independent and 60 Minutes. Patients come from as far away as the Philippines to have him operate, and doctors move to Toronto for year-long stretches to watch him work. This particular morning, it’s a surgeon from Singapore and another from Manhattan.

 

Up in his office, with his bookcases and antique surgical devices that have the feel of old mariners’ instruments, Dr. Lozano likens himself to an explorer – to Christopher Columbus, he says, “describing the frontiers of the brain.”

“I want to go where no one else has gone before,” he says, without irony.

THE SOUND OF SADNESS

The hands of a surgeon usually steal the show in an operating theatre. But with DBS, the ears play the starring role. The micro-electrode probe that descends into the brain one micron (a millionth of a metre) at a time detects the electrical signals in the tissue it penetrates.

Electrophysiologist William Hutchinson operates the probe, which is wired to a bank of audio-visual tracking equipment that lines the rear wall of the operating room like components in a stereo shop. There are oscilloscopes that display volts in visual spikes, amplifiers that translate the firing pattern of a single neuron into sound, suddenly filling the room with rhythmic pings and rat-tat-tats like eerie signals from a distant planet. Everyone falls silent, eavesdropping on the alien within.

They begin to sample the sounds of Mr. McCutcheon’s neurons 10 millimetres above the target in the thalamus. The neurons talk and the probe talks back, emitting a low-voltage current to elicit a response, and the cells can do one of two things: cease or fire.

“John, we’re going to put some electricity into your brain now,” Dr. Lozano announces. “You’ll hear a beep. Tell us if you feel something.”

After a zap several millimetres north of the target in the thalamus, Mr. McCutcheon reports sensation in his cheek, then his jaw, then somewhere around his ear.

“Okay, onward,” the doctor says, and the probe heads farther south to the cells that once moved his legs.

Periodically, Dr. Lozano puts his hands on Mr. McCutcheon, scratching his chest, poking his hip, patting his leg as he listens for the neural response his touch might trigger.

“Cells make different sounds in different regions. They’re like a guide; they tell you where you are in the brain,” he says. “It’s like driving through Europe. … You know where you are by the language they speak.”

Neurons that control vision fire at different rates than those that control movement. Some cells are idlers. Others burst and pop like the backbeat on a jazz track.  And how does sadness sound? “Cells firing five to 30 times per second,” he replies.

In DBS operations for depression, Dr. Lozano runs a show-and-tell. Instead of touching patients, he vies for emotion. He has them read moving stories or shows them pictures, scenes of splendour, or violence, images of despair or a sexual nature. He asks how it makes them feel, focusing on their words as well as the noise their neurons make.

But motion or emotion, the method is the same, he explains. When he tells Mr. McCutcheon to try to move his right foot, for example, a cell fires fast in the millisecond before the attempt. “Okay,” he says, “so that’s involved in planning the movement.”

The erratic sound of the misbehaving neurons ring clear – like static from a radio in need of tuning. “His neurons are firing abnormally, and we want to turn them down,” Dr. Lozano says. “It’s causing a brainstorm in the pain pathway.”

A few moments later, he reaches the target deep in the thalamus and signals Dr. Hutchinson to charge the probe. Mr. McCutcheon says it makes his legs tingle from hip to toe. “This might be a good spot” to place the first electrode, Dr. Lozano says.

They move next to strike the second target in the midbrain, the periaqueduct, where sensory circuits control the emotional response to pain – involved when a soldier fights on, oblivious to an injury, say, or when an athlete keeps playing despite a broken bone.

As the probe slides down, it passes cells that seem strangely quiet. “Silent neurons,” Dr. Lozano says, “terra incognita” – no one knows what they do, and electricity seems to have no effect on them.

A moment later, he steps away from the patient to whisper a prediction: “When we reach this target, he’s going to tell us he feels good. … Some people say, ‘Oh, I feel calm, mellow, like I had a double scotch.’

“Go,” Dr. Lozano says, directing Dr. Hutchinson to charge the probe.

“How does that feel, John?”

Suddenly, Mr. McCutcheon’s face relaxes: “Oh, what did you do? That feels good.”

Dr. Lozano asks if the feeling reminds him of anything.

“Like when the kids were born” is the reply.

Bingo. This will be the site for electrode No. 2.

The sensory circuits in the periaqueduct happen to be directly connected to Area 25 and the instant well-being Mr. McCutcheon felt when they charged it, Dr. Lozano says, was the same response from the first patient who underwent DBS for depression in May of 2003. “She suddenly said, ‘What have you done? The room is in colour.’ ”

REGROWING THE BRAIN

With depression, the electrodes seem to quiet the hyperactivity of Area 25 like a muzzle on a barking dog. Yet scientists suspect that the story is more complex.

Dr. Lozano, who grew up in Ottawa and holds the Canada research chair in neuroscience, estimates that the currents directly affect up to 20,000 neurons, but flow outward “like dropping a pebble in a pond.” Research suggests it may have an impact on the very structure of the brain.

In the mid-nineties, University of Calgary cell biologist Samuel Weiss discovered that the adult brain can actually produce new cells. Since then, some researchers have come to believe the steady growth of new brain cells may be crucial to mental health.

For example, imaging studies show that people with depression have a smaller hippocampus in their brains than healthy people do. Psychiatrist Glenda MacQueen, head of the mood disorders program at McMaster University in Hamilton, recently reviewed the brain images of more than 1,000 people with depression and 1,000 healthy control subjects, and found the hippocampus to be especially small in those who had suffered several episodes of depression.

Housed in the limbic lobe along with Area 25, the hippocampus is best known as a mansion of memory – the great neural archive that records the context of our lives. But it has also become a hot property in mood studies.

People with depression have long reported problems with memory. As well, half of people with depression have high levels of stress hormones circulating in their blood and it is the hippocampus that controls the chemical cascade that stress triggers. (When the brain mistakes a ruffling curtain for a tiger ready to pounce, it’s the hippocampus that says, “Relax, it’s only a cat,” Dr. MacQueen explains.)

Stress hormones, meanwhile, are particularly toxic to cells of the hippocampus, which may explain why the structure shrinks with depression. In animal studies, Dr. Lozano and colleagues have discovered that DBS can boost new brain-cell growth – particularly in the hippocampus. Neuroscientist Scellig Stone, who works with Dr. Lozano, has found that one hour of deep brain stimulation in a rat doubles its production of new cells.

Dr. Weiss speculated that depression that responds to therapy or medication may be the result of chemical imbalances built up over the short term. But deeply rooted depression may be more responsive to DBS if the procedure really does boost brain-cell growth.

Although Dr. MacQueen has tried to study the hippocampus size of depression patients before and after DBS, images taken so far have not allowed accurate measurements. For now, researchers must base their results on what the patients tell them.

PROS AND CONS

Through 2006, Mr. Miller imagined his electric moment – lying on the operating table, doctors flicking a switch and saving him. He had called his psychiatrist for a referral to the trial as soon as he saw the TV segment. Then he lobbied, pleading his case to the doctors running the trial, phoning and writing letters.

But he wasn’t alone. Results from the initial experiment made headlines around the world in 2005, and nearly 700 requests for DBS poured in. Even now, the waiting list has more than 30 patients.

Deciding who makes the cut is in part the job of Sidney Kennedy, the health network’s head of psychiatry. Deeply involved in planning the DBS trial, he describes the procedure as a “major paradigm shift” in the treatment of a mood disorder. “It has been an interesting role for the psychiatrist: He’s evolved from psychotherapies, to pharmacotherapy … to adjustments with stimulators. … It’s one of the best examples where psychiatry meets neuroscience.”

Dr. Kennedy, 57, had no great expectations when the trial began. Even after the initial heady results, he tried to wear “the hat of the skeptic.” But “I thoroughly believe now there are no five-year placebos,” he says (referring to how long the first patient has had relief of symptoms). “I do think a cycle of depression continues for these people, but it’s not as severe.”

Not that DBS is without its critics. For example, Jeffrey Schwartz, a renowned research psychiatrist at the University of California at Los Angeles, a leading proponent of cognitive behavioural therapy and co-author of The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force has called DBS “essentially nothing more than an electrical prefrontal lobotomy.”  He told a U.S. newspaper that its pioneers have been careful, but that he worries its widespread use could lead to abuse by companies or amateurs offering it to anyone who wants to tune up his mental state.

In response, Dr. Lozano stresses that, unlike other psychosurgeries, DBS can be reversed, the electrodes removed, and five years since their first patient, none has suffered serious side effects.

Dr. Kennedy says he suspects that it does not work for all patients because, like faces, no two brains are exactly alike. Different brain regions could be involved in depression in different people, he explains. “Maybe in 30 years, people will look back and say, ‘How primitive – they stuck electrodes in their brains and turned the batteries on.’ ”

Still, all surgeries carry a risk, Dr. Lozano notes. The experience with DBS for Parkinson’s suggests that one in every 500 patients will suffer a hemorrhage during the surgery. Four in a thousand will suffer a serious complication, such as a permanent neural deficit or even death. If the numbers of patients being treated rise appreciably, “it will happen” for depression as well, he says flatly. “It is just a matter of time.”

Even the positive affects rarely appear right away. A few patients report relief as soon as the electrodes have powered up. But for most, it takes weeks, even months, to find the right voltage and frequency – “the sweet spot,” as they call it.

After the operation, Dr. Kennedy and Dr. Giaccobe, their offices mere steps apart, see each patient once a week to track their progress and tweak their settings. As time passes, the appointments are less frequent, but they still require adjustments.

Unlike patients with pain, those with depression are not able, or allowed, to adjust their own voltage. For one thing, researchers say the electrodes should be on all the time. Adjusting them haphazardly could have negative effects.

“We’re managing this ever-growing cohort,” Dr. Kennedy says, which at the moment includes 30 men and women from their late 20s to their 60s. “We haven’t had people very often who couldn’t tolerate the stimulation. … If it’s up too high, they feel an inner restlessness, you know, ‘wired,’ and turning it back down relieves that.”

Even when they do find their sweet spot, Dr. Giaccobe says, it can be difficult for people who have been profoundly depressed for so long suddenly to reclaim their lives. “They still have ups and downs,” and even their relationships change. One patient grew frustrated with a partner who missed the needy and vulnerable homebody he had been when he was sick.

“In a way, this is like learning to walk on a new hip,” Dr. Giaccobe explains. “I help them adjust and I adjust them.”

AT LONG LAST RELIEF


After nearly a year of lobbying, doctors eventually decided that Mr. Miller fit the criteria of treatment-resistant depression. In February, 2007, a metal crown bolted to his temples, he at last found himself on the operating table.

But he did not have his electric moment then and there. He awoke from the procedure, groggy, sore and “deeply depressed.” A technician arrived at his bedside to switch on the stimulator, and he felt … nothing. “I was so upset. I went home devastated.”

He began to suspect that the treatment had failed, but Dr. Giaccobe gave him regular “pep talks” and, over several weeks, slowly increased the voltage. At month five, and nearly seven volts – about enough to power a smoke detector – the black fog finally lifted.

“I just woke up one morning and I felt good. I actually wanted to get out of bed. Ah, and I was hungry, I was so hungry – I couldn’t wait to eat.” He popped out to a deli had a Reuben sandwich for breakfast.

“I called my friends. I called my mom. I was, I don’t know, excited. I felt the joy of being alive.”

In the past year, Mr. Miller has rebuilt his life, visiting friends, playing sports and launching a business. But he has had his low points too. His father died of cancer last spring before he could see his son free of depression. Somehow the grief didn’t knock Mr. Miller back into the darkness. But certain symptoms return – sudden flashes of anxiety, trouble sleeping.

Dr. Giaccobe says patients can have their moods improve, but still have a lazy libido or erratic appetite. Sometimes such symptoms seem like warning signs that the treatment is failing – which is what happened to Mr. Miller after he went through the metal detector at the courthouse.

It seemed a reasonable concern – doctors give DBS patients exemption letters to use at airport security – but at the emergency appointment, Dr. Giaccobe reminds him that it can be tricky to distinguish depression from a mere mood swing.

“It’s hard when you’ve been sick for so long,” Mr. Miller says. “You have to remember that every bump in the road is not a return of the depression.”

“Okay, so let’s take a look,” Dr. Giaccobe says.

Mr. Miller pulls up his sweatshirt, exposing his chest, and looks down to the slight bump of his battery pack. He says he had joked with his fitness trainer that he would have to work out the “pecs” on the opposite side a little harder “to make it even.”

Dr. Giaccobe aims a remote control at the power-pack buried in Mr. Miller’s chest and flicks through settings like he’s changing TV channels.

“You’re at 6.75 volts,” he says. “I’m keeping it there.”

“Am I the highest patient you have?” Mr. Miller asks.

“No, there’s another patient around seven.”

“You don’t want to turn me up?” Mr. Miller asks, laughing.

“No,” Dr. Giaccobe says. “You’re good.” 

 

3 responses so far

Jun 30 2008

Another Perspective on Drugs…

Margaret Wente is a columnist for one of Canada’s earliest (if not first) “conservative” newspaper, the Globe & Mail, which became a bit more centrist once the really right wing paper, The National Post, hit the scene a number of years back.  She’s infamous for being a terrible interviewer, for not bothering to check her facts when she rants and raves, for making controversial and often insulting statements/claims, and for generally being a not so nice person.  In short, she tries to be the Canadian (although she’s American born) Ann Coulter, one of the most awful people in the world.

Well, here’s Wente’s take on the drug industry.  It’s interesting to watch as she acknowledges certain proven facts, yet inserts them in such a way that she’s essentially discounting these very fearful facts while trying to make her point.  Her point, which can be valid in some cases, appeals to those who don’t have the mental capacity to progress beyond Black & White Thinking.  That is, many people who buy into her argument–again, which has merit in some cases–are likely to be persuaded by the emotional impact of the column; they can probably think of people like the people Wente talks about who seemed to need medication to cope.

However, her simplistic approach tries to wrap you up in the emotion while severely downplaying the proven problems with big pharma.  She then concludes with a last-second, column-ending, happy shout-out to ECT: electroconvulsive therapy, or shock therapy. Once again, her simple-minded rant ignores the many problems associated with ECT, including the fact that more and more doctors are prescribing it for women suffering from post-partum depression–so that they don’t have to take medication while breast feeding, rather than trying to promote more family or societal support for such mothers.

Read for yourself:

The romance-of-madness myth (MARGARET WENTE, Globe and Mail, June 27, 2008)

Sometimes, I think Jack Nicholson was the worst thing that ever happened to mental illness. In One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, he played an anti-social rebel who took refuge in a loony bin, where he rallied the oppressed inmates to revolt against the tyrannical Nurse Ratched (who symbolized the rigid authoritarian forces of society). He was punished, of course. They tied him down and tortured him with electroshock, which turned him into a compliant vegetable.

The movie, one of the biggest hits of the seventies, reinforced the widespread belief of everybody under 30 that the people who ran the world (Richard Nixon, our parents) were the crazy ones, and the protesters, the rebels, the Merry Pranksters, and the nonconformists (i.e., us) were the sane ones. Society was mad, not Jack.

This week’s Globe and Mail series has given much attention to the stigma of mental illness. But the romanticizing of it has done a lot of damage, too. Thirty years ago, the people who flocked to see Jack Nicholson fervently believed that mind-warping substances such as dope and psychedelics threw open the gates to perception. We devoured the work of R.D. Laing (who argued that mental illness is a perfectly understandable reaction to the conditions of modern life) and Thomas Szasz (who argued that involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill is a crime against humanity). We idolized Virginia Woolf, Sylvia Plath and other exalted sufferers, convinced that madness and great art were two sides of the same coin. We also knew that mental institutions were full of sadists, who shocked and lobotomized their victims into submission.

Soon after came the great wave of deinstitutionalization. In the name of progress and humanity, the big old buildings were shut down across North America. The mentally ill would be better off in the community, it was thought, perhaps in small group homes. But they were never built, and those freed but tortured souls were left to fend for themselves on the streets. Madness had come to Yonge and Bloor in Toronto, and it wasn’t very romantic after all.

Today, mental illness has been acknowledged as a major cause of homelessness. On the streets, the dazed, the addicted and the witless are prone to disease and predation. Such is our compassion that we have made it all but impossible to hospitalize a mentally ill person against his will, or keep him in a safe place if he wants to leave, or give him treatment he doesn’t want. People in the grip of severe mental illness are seldom capable of making informed decisions. But the pendulum of human rights has swung so far the other way that involuntary treatment has become unthinkable.

The advent of modern psychopharmacology has been a boon for a many of these souls (so long as they take their meds, a big problem when you’re living on the streets). It is also a godsend for millions of the ordinary walking wounded – people who suffer lifelong depression, bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, postpartum depression and what used to be called nervous breakdowns. But today, the once-fashionable fear and loathing of mental institutions has morphed into a fear and loathing of Big Pharma. The anti-psychiatric narrative is essentially the same, only this time it’s drugs that are being used to enforce conformity to social norms.

Why have we turned into Prozac Nation? Because it’s in capitalism’s interest to produce happy, perky, well-adjusted workers and consumers! A variation of this theme is that, in our instant-gratification society, people are no longer willing to tolerate ordinary, garden-variety unhappiness. Another variation is that people’s feelings of numbness and distress are a perfectly natural reaction to our individualistic, disconnected society.

On the flip side is the charge that these drugs, although grossly overprescribed, really don’t do much good at all. They’re hardly better than placebos. Big Pharma has driven the demand with its relentless marketing campaigns, and bought off the medical and psychiatric establishment with billions in research dollars. “It’s well known that, if effective at all, antidepressants are barely better than sugar pills,” says Gordon Warme, a leading psychiatric critic.

Curiously, he himself is a psychiatrist who taught for decades at the University of Toronto. “Madness,” he says, “is another way of life, another way of being human.” I’m wondering whether he ever had a depressive episode so severe he didn’t get out of bed for a week. My guess is not.

Although Big Pharma has plenty to answer for, the impact on human suffering of modern psychotherapeutic drugs is hard to overstate. I have loved ones who, without them, would not be able to hold a job, live on their own, or stop thinking incessantly about decomposing bodies. Without medication, they’d probably be street people, or dead. I have friends who would not have their marriages, families, careers or the ordinary, garden-variety happiness that makes it worth getting up in the morning. Perhaps sugar pills would have worked for them, but I don’t think so. Then there are the one or two people I knew who committed suicide, shattering their families forever. I sometimes wonder if the right medication would have saved them, because cognitive therapy certainly didn’t. Or maybe folks such as Dr. Warme would say that killing yourself is just another way of being human.

I no longer think, as I did when I was young, that mental illness is romantic or that suffering is necessary to produce great art. Today, I think that talk therapy alone doesn’t always work – you might as well expect talk to heal a broken leg. I think pills for mood disorders are at least as great a blessing as pills for high blood pressure, or shots for diabetes. I even know of people who’ve been eased of their tremendous suffering by – listen up, Jack! – electroshock therapy. Yes, it’s made a comeback. It doesn’t hurt or turn you into a vegetable. And it works.

One response so far

Jun 29 2008

A New Twist on the Drug Issue…

The story below was sent once again by my most active news contributor. In case you don’t want to read the entire story, it goes like this: In contrast to my previous posts warning about the dangers of over-medicating children and adults with various types of drugs, this story tells of a husband and wife team of Recent Arguments for Birth Control who are selling PLACEBO pills to parents for their kids. Even though placebos can’t physically harm you–their very definition is that of a sugar capsule with no actual curative properties–they can mess you up psychologically.

Kids are being set up to believe that the cure for EVERYTHING is a magic pill. As they get older, guess where they’ll turn when life gets a bit difficult? Why do you think there’s finally a bigger stink regarding a) the over-prescription of powerful, psychotropc medication, b) the lack of ethics behind drug manufacturing and marketing for all types of medications, and c) the tendency to expose kids to drugs far too early and for things that many not necessarily require a medicinal approach? We did not get to this state overnight.

Anyone who knows the history of this tragic situation knows that it stemmed from a concerted effort by the drug companies to convince people that they need these drugs, often for things that really don’t require medication. These drug companies and lazy, ignorant, immoral, unethical, and/or evil physicians and psychiatrists are all complicit in this conspiracy. Yes, it is a conspiracy. If you don’t believe me, please read this previous post and then follow the links contained in it. It is a true horror story scarier than anything you will ever see on TV.

In any event, the story below adds a twist to this ever-worsening situation:

Doctors raise fears Obecalp, a new children’s placebo, will condition them to look for cures in pills June 28, 2008 (Megan Ogilvie HEALTH REPORTER)

Small, sweet and studded with cherry flavour, Obecalp would easily entice any candy crazy kid.

And for some parents, the white chewable tablets may be equally as tempting. The medicine, the first of its kind, is marketed as a cure-all for small hurts and ailments, able to treat everything from upset tummies to sleeplessness without the risks of adverse side effects. That’s because Obecalp is nothing more than a fruit-flavoured sugar pill meant to calm and soothe a child using the power of placebo. Though it may seem harmless, it raises a flurry of ethical questions about whether it conditions kids to always look for a cure in a pill.

“I invented Obecalp when I realized that children might need a little more than a kiss to make it go away,” writes Jennifer Buettner on its website, where a bottle of 50 pills can be purchased from anywhere in the world for $5.95 U.S. The Maryland mother of three launched Obecalp – placebo spelled backwards – online this month.

But experts are wary of Obecalp and say there is no need for a placebo pill in clinical practice, let alone in a parent’s medicine cabinet. Many believe it is wrong to intentionally dupe children into thinking a sugar pill is real medicine. And others are concerned a placebo will set a dangerous pill-popping precedent for children, creating a generation of kids who believe every ill and ailment can be fixed with medication. “Almost no pediatrician would prescribe it and few parents would turn to it,” says Dr. Maden Roy, chief of general pediatrics at McMaster Children’s Hospital and who consulted other hospital pediatricians about the product.

The placebo effect has a long history in medicine and doctors know of its potential benefits. The exact mechanism is not well understood, but scientists believe the expectation of getting treatment – even if that treatment has no active ingredients – can improve symptoms. Studies have shown some medications owe much of their success to the placebo effect. Roughly 80 per cent of benefits from taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, a class of antidepressants, may be due to it. And some men with erectile dysfunction may become more functional with just a placebo. A 2007 study of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder found some kids experienced some improvement, even when their usual medication was replaced with a placebo.

But even though placebos do work, experts say they come with many more risks than benefits, especially for children. Routinely offering a placebo may mask a real illness or a cry for help, which could then prevent or delay the child from getting medical help, said Roy. “There’s a 30 per cent chance a placebo will help on average,” said Roy. “But is that the treatment? No, it is not. The treatment is to spend time with the child and sort out his emotional issues.”

And while a placebo pill may immediately soothe a child, repeatedly using a deception strategy can chip away at that child’s trust. “I’m concerned about the effects on kids who would one day find out their parents had been repeatedly dishonest with them,” said Dr. Randi Zlotnik Shaul, a bioethicist at The Hospital for Sick Children. “It encourages the mindset that children do not need to be taken seriously when they are experiencing pain. We want to teach kids that their perspectives do matter and that they should trust they will be taken seriously when they say they are sick or in pain.”

Doling out a placebo pill any time a child complains of feeling unwell may also teach kids that a pill is the only solution for pain, said Zlotnik Shaul, noting there are other – and better – ways to help children. “Teaching children that hugs can make you feel better, or quiet time with a parent can make you feel better, these are messages they can take with them through life.”

Dennis Buettner, Jennifer’s husband and the spokesperson for Efficacy Brands, which markets Obecalp, said they are surprised by the controversy swirling around the product. They believed, he said, that a standardized placebo pill made with pharmaceutical grade ingredients would be a boon to the medical profession and would fill a much-needed niche in the market. Dennis, a consultant with Global Branding and Licensing in Severna Park, Md., said the Obecalp website has been inundated with emails and sales requests from all over the world, a sign of its success. He is careful to point out Obecalp is not a medicine, said he does not give medical advice and advises customers to consult their family doctor.

Regardless, Michael Rieder, a clinical pharmacologist at the University of Western Ontario and chair of the drug therapy committee of the Canadian Pediatric Society, said the use of placebos for kids is “dangerous and ill-advised.” More than anything, he said, a placebo makes parents feel better. Rieder, a father of three who has welcomed 40 foster babies into his family’s home, said medications should only be used when necessary. By and large, he said, the best pill is one you never have to take.

One response so far

Jun 27 2008

A Hummer for a WEDDING? Really? How Tacky…

As a follow-up to my recent story regarding high school students who were scammed by a scummy limo company (as I said in that post, it’s partially Karma Payback for caring so little about the planet by renting HUMMER limos), here’s more on that scumbag limo company, whose fraud goes even further than they realized.  In this case, some of the victims wanted the Hummer Limos for their WEDDING.  Oy….

No responses yet

Jun 27 2008

And Justice is SKEWED

This article, sent to me by my erstwhile contributor, highlights the issue of wrongful convictions and why I don’t support the death penalty:

Acquitted man demands justice reforms  RON BULL/TORONTO STAR

The case against Anthony Hanemaayer was based on faulty eyewitness identification evidence, which seemed so persuasive that conviction and imprisonment seemed certain. Despite his innocence, Hanemaayer chose to plead guilty in exchange for a more lenient sentence. He’s not the only Canadian who’s faced these predicaments:

Thomas Sophonow: Tried three times and wrongly convicted twice for the 1981 murder of Barbara Stoppel, 16, a Winnipeg waitress. Faulty eyewitness ID was a key component of the Crown’s case. Sophonow, who spent nearly four years in prison, was cleared in 2000 and awarded $2.3 million compensation.

Rick Norris: Wrongly convicted of raping his neighbour in Fergus, Ont., in 1979, largely on the basis of faulty identification by the victim. The real culprit was a man who, at one time, was Norris’s best friend. Norris, who spent nine months in jail, was acquitted in 1991 and awarded $502,000 compensation.

Dinesh Kumar: Kumar pleaded guilty to a crime he said he didn’t commit once confronted with an impressive Crown witness, pediatric pathologist Dr. Charles Smith. Kumar was charged in connection with the death of his 5-week-old son in 1992 and accepted a plea bargain the next year that resulted in a 90-day jail term. The Ontario Court of Appeal last month agreed to reopen Kumar’s appeal.
Wrongly convicted of Bernardo crime, Anthony Hanemaayer wants redress, inquiry and new witness rules

Anthony Hanemaayer’s acquittal yesterday for a 1987 sex attack committed by Paul Bernardo exposed what his lawyers call a multitude of problems plaguing Canada’s justice system, including the use of dangerous eyewitness evidence.  Hanemaayer’s lawyers hope his wrongful conviction and the 20 years he spent paying for Bernardo’s crime will translate into compensation for their client and a police investigation into whether the serial killer committed other offences, including the 1990 disappearance of Elizabeth Bain.

They also hope the case will change how eyewitness testimony is used, considered the leading cause of wrongful convictions. In the U.S., “eyewitness identification evidence” has played a role in about 75 per cent of wrongful convictions overturned through DNA testing.  In Canada, a hard-hitting report came seven years ago on the case of Thomas Sophonow, who was wrongly convicted twice of a 1981 murder. Few of its recommendations to reduce miscarriages of justice from the use of this evidence have been put into place.

“Anthony Hanemaayer’s wrongful conviction could happen just as easily in 2008 as it did back in 1989,” lawyer James Lockyer said after Hanemaayer emerged with his parents into the sun outside the Ontario Court of Appeal to enjoy his first moments as a finally free man. 

“I’m very happy that it’s over,” said Hanemaayer, a soft-spoken 40-year-old roofer who appeared close to tears, including when asked about his parents, Peter and Wilma. “If I didn’t have them,” he said, “I’d be lost.”  Hanemaayer was accused of being the knife-wielding assailant who broke into a Scarborough house through a basement window sometime before dawn on Sept. 29, 1987, crept upstairs to a 15-year-old girl’s bedroom and threatened to kill her if she didn’t stay quiet. Startled by the victim’s mother, the attacker ran out the door.

“This was a particularly nasty crime and it took no imagination to know what the intruder’s intentions were,” Lockyer told an appeal court panel headed by Justice Marc Rosenberg, who expressed profound regret for the “devastating effect” the case had on Hanemaayer and his family.  Hanemaayer said it’s impossible to reduce the ordeal to dollars. Nineteen at the time of his arrest and newly married, he lost his wife and expectations for the future.  He had been working at a construction site in the neighbourhood, when he was identified by the victim’s mother as the attacker. Her honest but mistaken observation was the key component of the Crown’s case.  Hanemaayer felt certain her testimony would put him behind the walls of a penitentiary for at least six years. Part way through his 1989 trial, he changed his pleas to guilty and was sentenced to two years less a day for breaking and entering and assault with a weapon.

“It happens more often than you think, in serious cases with a defendant who swears he’s innocent,” said Frank Addario, president of the Criminal Lawyers’ Association, “They cave in and plead guilty for the certainty of a reduced sentence.”

Lockyer said both Hanemaayer and the victim were let down by the justice system.  Notes made by the prosecutor at Hanemaayer’s preliminary hearing indicate she recognized the weakness of her case was that it was based on one woman who had at most a 60-second glimpse of the attacker, the appeal panel was told. On the other hand, the prosecutor considered it a plus that the victim’s mother was very confident.  That, in itself, is a problem.

Elizabeth Loftus, a psychologist and noted memory expert from the University of Washington, told the public inquiry into Sophonow’s case that there’s little connection between an eyewitness’s confidence level and accuracy – but confident eyewitnesses have a powerful effect on jurors.  Hanemaayer’s trial lawyer seemed awed by the testimony of the victim’s mother and only too willing to arrange for his client to enter a guilty plea, Lockyer said.  “We didn’t have money for a top-notch lawyer,” said Peter Hanemaayer.

Bernardo made an overture to police through his lawyer to discuss other crimes in 2006. He described the 1987 attack in detail to two Toronto police detectives.   Although police met with Hanemaayer soon after the Bernardo interview and told him they didn’t believe he’d committed the crime after all, they never mentioned they’d spoken with the serial killer, let alone that he’d confessed.  Hanemaayer only learned that last year, when the Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted offered to take up his case. Were it not for that, “I probably would have gone to the grave” blamed for Bernardo’s crime, he said.

The association had been given the transcript of the Bernardo interview as part of the evidence the Crown turned over to the defence for the trial of Robert Baltovich, Bain’s former boyfriend, who had been scheduled to stand trial a second time this past spring for her murder.   Acquitted in April after the Crown admitted it had no case against him, Baltovich was also in court yesterday, supporting Hanemaayer, and echoed calls for an inquiry.

One response so far

Jun 24 2008

Evil Starts at Home…

Below is a story on an issue that’s receiving more attention recently but it unfortunately is often presented in a poor manner. That is, too many parents do not recognize how serious of an issue bullying really is. I’ve seen far too many parents fail in their duty as caregivers by letting their kids just do whatever they want without properly guiding/teaching them. They somehow think “kids will be kids,” and “they’ll work it out themselves,” and “that’s what kids do.”

Although such sentiment can be true sometimes, in many cases those are some of the stupidest/most ignorant words a parent can say. Namely, when we see that most adults in all spheres of life cannot resolve issues as ideally as we would hope, why should we expect children to manage any better?!

The last decade or two has seen the nastiest, most mean-spirited themes and tones in kids’ programs ever. It’s not a coyote trying to kill a road runner, which kids eventually realize is fantasy. No, it’s “normal” kids acting really cruelly to each other and being rewarded for it to the point that such inappropriate behaviour becomes the norm for the kids watching. And incompetent parents who are “too busy” to play an active role in their kids’ lives do not monitor or discuss with their kids what they’re watching, so they know that certain attitudes and behaviours they see on TV are not appropriate nor acceptable.  Hell, too many parens convey the same kinds of attitudes themselves.

Unfortunately, as is often the case, good intentions get presented poorly, so we see parents and schools outlawing any competitive games.  We see schools applying “zero tolerance” policies to games such as “tag” or “cops and robbers.”  These kinds of inane over-reactions are what encourage the average person–who, as I’ve said, is not that bright and typically engages in “black and white thinking”–to think the issue is being blown out of proportion.

Such people then can continue blindly allowing their own kids to become the kinds of cruel, selfish, mean, back-stabbing, devious creeps we see in the news all the time.  Such scum are usually not born that way.  They usually learn to be scum by their caregivers, siblings, peers, and/or media.  And only a good parent can intervene to teach/show them the right way.

Look around with a critical eye and you will see how many “bad” parents there are.  They don’t have to be as bad as Bernardo’s father (thanks, FunkyMe) to make their kids scum.  Letting kids be exposed to things they don’t understand, so that they blindly emulate what they see without any guidance from their parents is one of the most common symptoms of a BAD PARENT.

READ ON: 

Bullying starts when they’re still playing Barbies
(June 23, 2008) LEANNE ITALIE — ASSOCIATED PRESS

Recess was Allie Long’s favorite part of the day until the second grade, when some of her friends on the playground pressured her to join their whisper campaign against a classmate. Allie shrugged. She didn’t want to hear their rumor or help spread it around. In an instant, her best friends since kindergarten became her tormenters.

“They started taunting and teasing her,” said Allie’s mom, Trudy Ludwig. “She was on this play structure and they blocked all of the exits and wouldn’t let her off. They started moving closer to her. Allie just freaked out. One of the girls realized it was getting out of hand and got a teacher to help.”

Bullying among adolescents has captured the attention of researchers, educators and parents alarmed by a parade of mean girls and cyber-bullies caught in mid-punch on viral video. But such aggression may not just happen in a whirl of adolescent hormones, some in the growing anti-bully movement argue.

Some older bullies were “Barbie brats” first. In Allie’s case, the kids were talked to, but things weren’t the same at her Beaverton, Ore., school. “My daughter cried herself to sleep on and off for several months,” Ludwig said. “She had stomach aches. The phone stopped ringing. No playdates. No invitations to sleepovers.” They were just 7 years old.

Meline Kevorkian, a Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., researcher and public speaker on bullying, surveyed 167 educators last year and 25 percent indicated bullying occurs most in elementary schools. Research also indicates that three-quarters of 8- to 11-year-olds report they’ve been bullied, with more than half identifying it as a “big” problem, Kevorkian said.

“It could be you wear the wrong shoes or the wrong socks. If you didn’t go to the Hannah Montana concert. Your lunch smells. You can’t wear certain bows in your hair,” she said. “It’s not that the victims are all going to grow up and shoot kids in their high school, but it’s the message that making fun of people will make you popular.”

Rumour-spreading, teasing, exclusive clubs, secrets. What social scientists describe as “relational aggression” is often written off among younger kids as routine rites of passage not worthy of extra hands-on attention, Kevorkian and other anti-bully experts said.

Parents of targeted children agreed. “Everybody seems under the impression that their child is well behaved in all settings,” said Lisa Borre, whose 9-year-old son, Franklin, loves sports but is small for his age and often struggles for equal time during playground baseball and basketball games in Libertyville, Ill.

“Nobody is willing to believe their children might behave differently on the playground,” she said. “I just sort of felt like at this age the kids would still be gentler, kinder, would still behave more like little children. It’s almost like a smaller version of an adult world that he’s dealing with.”

Ludwig, who was inspired by her now 14-year-old daughter’s experience to write four picture books on bullying, said girls in particular often connect by sharing secrets that can later be turned into weapons. Such verbal abuse and social manipulation, which is on the rise in boys, “flies under the radar” of harried parents, teachers or baby sitters.

“It’s evident in preschool. ‘If you don’t let me play with that toy I won’t invite you to my birthday party,’” Ludwig said. “Intentional exclusion is bullying. Giving the silent treatment is bullying. It’s not a part of growing up. It’s not something kids can work out themselves. It’s not normal conflict. We’ve normalized this abnormal behaviour in our society.”

Little research has tracked bullying among the very young, but the topic is beginning to gain momentum. Intervention programs, including fifth-graders tapped as peer mediators on playgrounds, began popping up a few years ago in elementary schools, but the institutional response to bullying is often piecemeal or inconsistent, advocates said.

Michele Borba, who writes and speaks frequently on bullying, felt so intensely about such incidents among the very young that she helped develop a “Caring Corners” doll house due on the market later this year, designed to talk to kids about positive behaviour. “Little kids are born to be kind-hearted,” Borba said. “They’ve got that natural empathy, but unless you nurture it, it lies dormant.”

Nurturing empathy might be hard for competitive parents who scream at 6-year-olds during soccer games, or buy Coach bags for their girls, then wonder out loud who’s carrying the knockoffs, said Barbara Kimmel, the mother of two boys, ages 11 and 14, in Morris County, N.J.

Technology makes it even harder. “The cyber-bullying starts at 10 or 11 now,” she said. “It’s pervasive.”

To psychologist Jennifer Hartstein, who works with troubled adolescents in New York City, signs are evident even earlier. She cites a recent party she attended for a 6-year-old that featured a pinata. “It was, like, who can you step on and push fast enough to get the candy,” she said. “It’s this ‘me generation’ of ‘I have to get what’s mine.’ It’s the precursor to more serious bullying. You really have to catch it as it happens at younger ages.”

7 responses so far

Jun 22 2008

Lesson in Life, Business, and Karma…

I just realize this post I wrote last week was never sent out:

Okay, so hundreds of high school students were scammed by a Recent Argument for Birth Control who supposedly runs a limo company. As always, this link may become inactive in two weeks, but if you follow it before then, you will see that a bunch of students from at least nine different high schools paid a bunch of cash (from $500 deposits to several thousands of dollars) to shady supposed limo owners, who provided no pictures of their limos, had no office, would meet only in places such as parking lots, provided no receipts (aside from hand written notes on scrap paper), and refused to meet for follow up discussions about all these suspicious facts or irregularities.

Yet still the kids paid their money, ended up getting scammed and having their proms ruined, and also ended up having to fork over more money for taxis in some cases when these corrupt “limo” owners stranded them in the middle of the night. Well, this seems like it can be a lesson in “Buyer Beware,” but also in the need for parental guidance, even when the kids think they’re old and savvy enough to rent limos on their own.

Based on information provided in the story, it seems clear that one of the owners of the company is George Skondras, who lives at 59 Marilake Dr. in Scarborough (the story said he lived on Marilake Dr. in Scarborough, so how many “Skondras” can there be living on that street?). His phone number is (416) 915-0291 and although he denies being affiliated with the company, it is obvious that he is indeed one of the scheming owners. I hope a follow-up story indicates that some of those families have taken it upon themselves to pay Skondras a visit or at least call him at all hours of the night, demanding their money.

On a final note, I consider this a bit of Karma payback, since all these kids (and others) think it’s cool to rape the planet by renting out these insanely huge hummers. Yeah, I know limos are part of the prom tradition, but HUMMERS? That’s just overkill and goes against everything a conscientious young person (or anyone else) should consider, even for a prom.  You’re never too young to think about the future and to think about what you can do to help avoid killing our planet even faster and further.

5 responses so far

Jun 22 2008

More on Evil (or is that Evil Moron?)

I’m exhilarated to read the interesting and thoughtful exchanges between a few readers of this blog (Lily and FunkyMe) with respect to this recent blog on Bernardo and this blog on that scum who brutally murdered his tiny little niece. Also, one of my most valued contributors sent me some more information on Bernardo’s pathetic attempts to portray himself as anything other than the psychopathic deviant that he is, and his delusional hope of getting paroled early, despite having been labelled as a “dangerous offender,” which is supposed to keep him locked up indefinitely. Read on:

JUSTICE REPORTER — June 21, 2008

In his first interview since being imprisoned for life in 1995, serial killer Paul Bernardo told police that sexual “performance anxiety” was the driving force that led him to leave a trail of dead girls and sexual violence across Southern Ontario. That’s what I had back then, so I used sex as a vice,” Mr. Bernardo said in the April 16, 2006, police interview. “Now, I work out. I wake up every day knowing I’m not psychopathic. I care about people. I cried during 9/11. I cried during Columbine.”

In an interview transcript filed in the Ontario Court of Appeal, Mr. Bernardo told two Toronto police investigators that he had spent endless hours trying to come to grips with deep-seated insecurities - involving his “baby chest,” his having been a nerdy schoolboy, and his penchant for forcing rape victims to disparage their boyfriends’ sexual prowess. “It’s all power and control, because you’re so insecure in yourself,” he said. “I was the type of guy who would freeze at baseball plays. I don’t want to swing because I know I’m gonna miss. I remember the first time I went waiting at Mother’s Pizza, I was so scared to walk up to the table.”

Mr. Bernardo, known as the Scarborough rapist, was convicted of killing schoolgirls Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy, and also of almost 20 sexual assaults. The interview took place at Kingston Penitentiary, where he is in a maximum-security, solitary-confinement unit and prohibited from having contact with the news media.
“I’m the worst piece of crap on the planet, yet I get up every day,” Mr. Bernardo told Detective Brad Hoover and Detective-Constable Darlene Coulis. “I work out. I don’t sit there crying in my cell. And you know, I don’t feel threatened because someone called me an idiot, you know, where I have to attack. … Everyone treats me that way. I have no friends. I have nobody. But I handle it.”

Clearly intent on convincing the officers that he was rehabilitated, Mr. Bernardo said that he had not used drugs or alcohol in prison. Nor, he said, had he attempted to take up offers of sexual services he had had from women since arriving in prison. I get letters,” he said. “I get lots of letters. No, thanks. It’s egocentric for someone to come in. I’m not a sex predator … I don’t engage in deviancy at all. I’ve overcome all this stuff. I don’t have a girlfriend. I don’t have relations; don’t want one.”

Correctional Services Canada officials said yesterday that privacy rules prevent them from revealing whether Mr. Bernardo can have conjugal visits. However, he implied to the investigators that the choice was his. At one point, he said that “bringing a woman to orgasm is what gives me pleasure - which is the case now. “Am I going to bring somebody here, you know, to this horrible situation? Bring her in as Paul Bernardo’s girlfriend and subject her to that just so I can have my sex or relationship? I’m not gonna to do it - not until I’m out of prison.” Mr. Bernardo also denied harbouring antipathy toward women: “I loved women and obviously loved sex because of the vice at the time. But there was never any hatred against women. They were my best friends, uh, mostly.”

Speaking in a rambling, stream-of-consciousness manner, he insisted he would be a solid prospect for parole when he becomes eligible in 2010 for a 15-year review under the Criminal Code’s so-called faint-hope clause. He said his newfound insight into his character flaws could have saved him from being plunged into “a horrible, horrible existence.

“Every day, it’s ‘Bernardo - schoolgirl killer,’ ” he said. “It’s horrible to be pounded with that all the time. I got it yesterday, today, all the time. And it’s people that I could bully because I’m bigger physically and a better fighter. But I don’t engage in that. I walk away, disgraced and humiliated, but I can handle it. I’m losing the battles to win the war,” he told the police officers. “The war is not a war against you guys and a war against the Attorney-General, so that I can go and rape again. The war is the war of life - my mistakes in life.”

Mr. Bernardo also appeared to acknowledge for the first time since his murder trial that he was present when Kristen and Leslie were killed, although he continued to assert that his wife at the time, Karla Homolka, actually strangled them. t another point in the interview, he insisted that police and psychiatrists were wrong to believe that his crimes had progressed steadily from minor, less violent attacks to sadistic murders. A gruesome attack was sometimes followed by a less violent one, he said. “If you look back at some of the first ones - in ‘88, the girl got her arm broken. A lot afterwards didn’t. … You have ups and down - depending on the more they fought, the more I fought.”

He also disputed police assertions that he had hung on to his rape victims’ personal items and identification cards as trophies. Mr. Bernardo said he “took stuff from the victims as kind of a deterrence thing. Okay, like, ‘I know where you live, so don’t say anything.’ It does a disservice, because if you really want to profile me correctly, it’s not good to say that. … It misrepresents who I was, and what I done those things for.”

AND:
Despite what he says, killer will never be paroled, says spokesman for victims’ families

Jun 22, 2008 04:30 AM

Paul Bernardo is deluding himself and others by suggesting he is a reformed psychopath who would never rape or kill again, said the lawyer for his victims’ families, adding that Bernardo could never muster the medical evidence to support his outrageous claims.
“I think the general public should feel comfortable in the fact that Paul Bernardo will never ever be paroled,” lawyer Tim Danson said yesterday in an interview.

Bernardo’s comments from a 2006 jailhouse police interview appeared in newspapers yesterday, including the Star, after the transcript was filed with the Ontario Court of Appeal in connection with an application by Anthony Hanemaayer of London, Ont. Hanemaayer is asking to be exonerated in a 1989 sex attack after being told by the Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted that Bernardo confessed to it.

In the police interview, Bernardo said he plans to apply for parole in 2010 under the so-called faint-hope clause, after serving 15 years for the murders of Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy. The Ontario government has said it would fight any such attempt. But Bernardo, imprisoned since 1995, said he thinks he would make a good parole candidate.

Danson, the lawyer for the Frenches and the Mahaffys, said yesterday: “Anybody who is trained in the area understands that this is a psychopath at his best, trying to manipulate the system and do it in a way that appears to be cocky and confident. That’s what makes psychopaths so dangerous, because generally they’re very smart and they can be endearing, but there’s an evilness that penetrates so deep that in the medical world that is recognizable.” Danson said he would be very surprised if Bernardo could medically prove he no longer harbours psychopathic tendencies and presents no threat to public safety.

Another factor leading Danson to believe Bernardo will never earn his freedom back is the fact that Bernardo was designated a dangerous offender, which allows someone to be jailed indefinitely. “It’s my legal opinion that before he’s entitled to apply under the faint-hope clause, he has to deal with his dangerous offender designation,” Danson said. He said he believes as a dangerous offender, Bernardo would not be able to apply for parole. And even in the highly unlikely event that the parole board reconsiders the dangerous offender designation, Danson said it’s his opinion that no jury would ever okay his application under the faint-hope clause. “Once a psychopath, always a psychopath.”

4 responses so far

Jun 21 2008

Speaking of Pure Evil…

I recently wrote a blog arguing that, just because one of Canada’s most notorious Arguments for the Death Penalty, Paul Bernardo, denied killing Elizabeth Bain, we shouldn’t assume that he didn’t do it. As mentioned in that post, a psychopath can change his tactics very quickly, depending on his most salient motives at the time.  And often times they don’t care about whether their new tactics/stories contradict previous ones (as explained in this recent post on another sadistic monster who deserves to die).

So I hope people can see why it’s far too simplistic and narrow-minded to say, “Well, he confessed to a bunch of rapes that weren’t already pinned on him (and some may not have even been committed by Bernardo), so if he didn’t admit to Bain’s murder, he must not have done it.” That is, as mentioned in my previous post on the Bumbling Bernardo, he even admits that confessing to her murder would mean an extra life sentence, hence he has a good motive to lie about it.

So why did he confess to other crimes? Most likely notoriety and attention at the time, as those were his most salient needs back then. But later, he must’ve heard somewhere that there could be some hope for a release from jail before he dies.  If you have any doubt about this delusional belief, please read the article below, forwarded to me by one of my highly esteemed contributors. The very last line is the most important one regarding the points made in this thread, although the earlier parts also help give you some insight into the mind of a delusional, narcissistic, remorseless killer:

Sexual ‘anxiety’ drove me: Bernardo
Killer suggests he’s not a psychopath anymore

(Jun 21, 2008 04:30 AM Tracey Tyler Legal Affairs Reporter)

Serial killer Paul Bernardo says sexual “performance anxiety” was the motivating factor behind his deadly crime sprees that culminated in the murders of Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy. In his first interview since being imprisoned for life as a dangerous offender in 1995, Bernardo told two Toronto police detectives that while he found his “sex deviance” discouraging, he was “using sex as a vice” to combat his insecurities.

My, my thing was not to hurt these girls at all, I just wanted the sex,” he told the officers during the two-hour interview inside Kingston Penitentiary on April 13, 2006. “You know when you’re a sex predator … that’s what you do, right, ’cause that’s your life. “I mean it’s your vice and me I had a performance anxiety,” he said. “You know you have power, control, or younger victims … at Daytona Beach or whatever.” Bernardo appeared to question whether it’s fair that he should bear the label of psychopath for his entire life on the basis of the sexual assaults and murders he committed.

“When people try to say you’re (a) psychopath – because you didn’t care about their feelings, because you only cared about yourself, and that’s very true. But are you a psychopath your entire life … Or are you a psychopath at that moment and time when you’re egocentric about your sex?”

In addition to killing schoolgirls French and Mahaffy, Bernardo, known as the Scarborough rapist, was convicted of almost 20 sexual assaults. He told the officers that a rapist is usually depicted in movies as “the guy with the big thick Coke-bottle glasses. “It’s not what you look like, it’s … what’s in you, you know, do you have that performance anxiety in you.”

Extracts from the interview have been filed in the Ontario Court of Appeal in connection with an application by Anthony Hanemaayer, a 40-year-old roofer from London, Ont., who was convicted of a knifepoint attack on a 15-year-old Scarborough girl in 1989 to which Bernardo has now confessed to committing. Hanemaayer, who pleaded guilty to charges of assault with a weapon and breaking-and-entering, will appear before a three-judge appeal court panel next week seeking to withdraw his guilty pleas and be acquitted on both counts. He has said that he pleaded guilty because he feared the trial was going against him and he would face a heavy prison sentence.

The victim, then a Grade 9 student, awoke at 5 a.m. on Sept. 28, 1987 to the sound of her bedroom door opening. The person in the doorway jumped on her, straddled her lower back and said “I have a knife and I’ll kill you if you don’t be quiet.”

Bernardo also revealed that he is preparing to apply for permission to appear before a jury 15 years into his sentence – in 2010 – to seek the right to apply for parole ahead of schedule.

4 responses so far

Jun 21 2008

Pure Evil

The Most Recent Argument for Birth Control doesn’t even come close to describing this evil scumbag who brutally murdered his niece by perhaps snapping her backwards over his knee.

I followed this story from the beginning and am repulsed by this evil monster.  As mentioned, the only reason I don’t believe in the death penalty is the unacceptably high number of people wrongly accused of murder and other crimes.  However, in this case, there seems to be no doubt that this vile animal murdered his niece and does not deserve to stay on this earth.  He truly is the Most Recent Argument for the Death Penalty. 

One of the saddest parts of this story is that the poor girl’s mother, who had already fled an abusive husband–who is also a good Argument for the Death Penalty for beating both his wife and his infant daughter–was aware that this newer savage had already hurt the girl on several occasions.  So why the f*ck did she leave him alone with her girl so that he could slaughter her?

Unfortunately, this kind of poor judgment is all too common among women who have a history of being abused themselves.  In most cases they will allow their own children to be abused at the hands of the millions of Arguments for the Death Penalty because these women have such a poor self-concept and their views of the world and the people in it have become so skewed due to their own traumatic upbringings.  In the end, they often fail to see reality for what it is–sometimes in small ways, many times in very important areas.

7 responses so far

Next »