I’ve got to stop listening to Talk Radio. Both stations (if anyone knows of any others in the GTA region besides 640 and 1010, please let me know) reported on this Canadian animal who spent seven years in prison in India I believe for dousing his sister in law in gasoline and then setting her on fire to burn to death. He then returns to Canada and applies to have his new wife come over. Well, the one person in immigration Canada with two brain cells working raises a red flag and denies the wife entry, since we have rules against evil scum such as this monster. But then the typical Canadian beuracracy takes over and determines that this rule applies only to blood relatives (and, apparently, spouses). So now we’re going to bend over backwards and let this piece of shit argument for the death penalty live in marital bliss with what I can only imagine is a very stupid and/or pathetic bride (if she’s never heard of his past, or if she’s being forced to marry him, I take it back).
In other parts of the world, a woman who was scarred by (I think) her ex-bf when he threw acid in her face is asking for an eye for an eye and wants the courts to burn his eyes with acid so this other evil fuck can never harm another person. As barbaric as it seems, I’m all for it.
Now back to the home of the (do whatever you want and even if you get caught we’ll soon set you) free, where school children have now learned via their trustees that, if you get caught breaking the law, all you have to do is re-pay some of what you stole and not even apologize for it and all is well in La-La Land called Canaduh. Here’s the latest on a story I’ve written about several times:
Catholic trustees avoid police probe — No grounds for criminal investigation are found in report about questionable, prohibited expenses
Toronto’s shamed Catholic school trustees, stripped of power and pummelled by critics for an expense account scandal and not balancing their books, will not be investigated by Toronto police. Two weeks after Ontario’s education minister gave police a damning forensic audit of Toronto Catholic District School Board trustees that cited almost $30,000 in questionable and prohibited expenses from alcohol and vacations to even ice cream from Dairy Queen, police say they have assessed the report and found no grounds to investigate any trustees for criminal wrongdoing. While noting many of the trustees’ books were not in order, police said ineligible expenses have been repaid and the audit by Ernst and Young provided no evidence that further investigation is needed.
However Board Chair Catherine LeBlanc-Miller said she worries a police review that takes “two short weeks does not seem thorough to me. Will the public be satisfied that all matters have been truly resolved? “A thorough investigation is what the public deserves and what my colleagues deserve. I worry now we are all still under a cloud.” Education Minister Kathleen Wynne said last night she is awaiting a written report from police, but will require trustees to pay back almost $20,000 in expenses the audit deemed “potentially” ineligible, largely for lack of proper documentation. “That money will have to be repaid, either voluntarily or by taking it out of their honorarium,” said Wynne.
Most trustees have paid back nearly $10,000 in ineligible expenses, but the audit found trustees Mary Cicogna, Joseph Martino and Sal Piccininni had charged the board for $18,857 in expenses the auditors deemed “potentially ineligible.” Piccininni’s questionable spending is the highest at $13,804 – largely for sports equipment and clothing from a company that has the same address as his constituency assistant.
Cicogna has repaid $373 for Internet gaming, luggage and a car wash, but had refused to repay $918 for a gold school-board ring, sun lamp and personalized licence plates, the report noted, because she “disagrees with our assessment of the expenses.”
Martino has paid back all of $1,783 he received for ineligible expenses, including tax software, dry cleaning, shoe repair and car washes, and said he would be prepared to repay $330 more in Highway 407 tolls and several meals outside Toronto. But he has said he does not owe $2,113 cited by the auditors as “potentially ineligible.”
Trustee Rob Davis questioned whether the process has been worth the money it has cost taxpayers, from the $250,000 provincial audit to the $190,000-a-year salary being paid to educator Norbert Hartmann to take over the financial reins of the board until the deficit has been wiped out. Wynne said it has not been a waste of money. “The auditor found there was abuse of public dollars, much of which has been paid back, and the whole exercise has been about restoring the integrity of this board. There are principles at stake here and we have a clearer notion now of the relationship between staff and trustees.”
And finally, here is the latest on another story I wrote about before. This “woman” should be involuntarily sterilized:
Woman found guilty in cyber-bullying trial – But mistrial declared on conspiracy charge
A Missouri mother on trial in a landmark cyber-bullying case was convicted yesterday of only three minor offences for her role in a mean-spirited Internet hoax that apparently drove a 13-year-old girl to suicide. The federal jury could not reach a verdict on the main charge against 49-year-old Lori Drew – conspiracy – and rejected three other felony counts of accessing computers without authorization to inflict emotional harm.
Instead, the panel found Drew guilty of three misdemeanour offences of accessing computers without authorization. Each count is punishable by up to a year in prison and a $100,000 fine. Drew could have faced 20 years in jail if convicted of the four original charges. U.S. District Judge George Wu declared a mistrial on the conspiracy count. There was no immediate word on whether prosecutors would retry her.
Tina Meier, the mother of the dead girl, said Drew deserves the maximum of three years behind bars. “It’s not about vengeance; it’s about justice,” she said. Prosecutors said Drew and two others created a fictitious 16-year-old boy on MySpace and sent flirtatious messages from him to teenage neighbour, Megan Meier. The “boy” then dumped Megan in 2006, saying, “The world would be a better place without you.” Megan promptly hanged herself with a belt in her bedroom closet.
Prosecutors said Drew wanted to humiliate Megan for saying mean things about Drew’s teenage daughter. They said Drew knew Megan suffered from depression and was emotionally fragile. Drew was not directly charged with causing Megan’s death. Instead, prosecutors indicted her under the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Among other things, Drew was charged with conspiring to violate the fine print in MySpace’s terms-of-service agreement, which prohibits the use of phony names and harassment of other MySpace members.