Rational Radical

I’ve written before about how people who claim that Person A couldn’t have done Crime XYZ because he or she was such a “nice person” or came from a “nice family” usually don’t really know what they’re talking about.  That is, they see only one or two parts of a person or family, while there are far more parts they’ll never see.  Heck, even the person him/herself is unaware of many of these parts, since most people have relatively little insight into themselves (and those who claim to have the most insight often have the least).

Recently, I wrote about a horrific act by one or two men, which ended in one or both of them trying to kill and decapitate a mother/girlfriend.  Supporters of each of the suspects in this evil act are both claiming that “their person” could never have done such a thing.  But at least one of them did it, maybe both.  So who is it?

I bring this up only because The Star’s Rosie DiManno wrote something interesting about this evil fuck, David Bagshaw, who murdered an innocent girl, Stephani Rengel, who compassionately tried to bring that scumbag into her home to help him.  Here’s the part I agree with (and the rest of the story is in the COMMENTS section below, along with another story about the idiot forensic psychiatrist who does not realize that INTERVIEWS with criminals (or anyone else) are not nearly as good as PROPER PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING! 

Rosie’s words:  In my crime-and-court experience, people capable of and predisposed to killing usually reek of it. They radiate menace. It seeps out of their pores. Violence or ominous behaviour lurks in their background. They all but have a pixel bulletin crawling across their foreheads: Danger, deranged, disaffected, sociopathic, likely-to-snap. This is strictly my gut instinct, but I suspect David Bagshaw might have got around to doing murder some day, even had he not crossed paths so disastrously with Melissa Todorovic and fallen under the spell of a homicidal succubus.

This handout photo shows David Bagshaw, formerly identified only as D.B., who was sentenced to life in prison Sept. 28, 2009 for the murder of Stefanie Rengel.

Knowing this fine young, ambitious woman personally, I am so happy that she is causing a wave for such an important topic with this ad she co-directed and starred in.   It’s sad that we still get so crazy over something like this, but at least it draws people’s attention to a worthy cause and will help educate young people about a disease that no longer is “your grandmother’s disease” only.

Breast cancer fundraiser video too titillating?

Aliya-Jasmine Sovani’s breasts jiggle and wiggle for the camera in…

Okay, maybe I’m toning down my language because he’s one of Canada’s most powerful lawyers.   I know Clayton Ruby has done some very important work in and out of the courts for the people and the legal system of Canada. And I know he’s only doing his job by trying to get a new trial for an evil monster who allowed his son to be murdered in one of the most horrible manners possible.   

But the Star story below shows that Ruby really is doing our just-ass system a disservice and is so far off the mark in this case that he needs to back off and not worry so much about getting his face on TV again.  Namely, how dare he pull the RACE CARD in this case when he says, there was already “hatred and disgust at these two accused black persons“?  And as already mentioned in my previous post on the topic, why shouldn’t the judge refer to the tortured and murdered boy as “poor, pitiful Randal“?!

The part that pisses me off most, however, is Ruby’s claim that “We provide an appeal because it’s good for us to have a justice system we can be proud of. It’s not for him, (Tony Dooley) it’s for us.” Given the clear facts of the case, given that there is no doubt that these two monsters directly caused this poor boy’s slow, horrific death, and given that each of these monsters deserves the death penalty, how dare Ruby say this waste of tax-payers’ money is for US, rather than that scumbag, coward Tony Dooley?! 

Ah, screw it. FUCK YOU, CLAYTON RUBY!

New trial sought in Dooley murder: Judge’s use of inflammatory language in his charge to the jury undercut jurors’ ability to fairly assess the evidence, lawyer argues

A Superior Court judge’s use of inflammatory language in his jury charge undercut jurors’ ability to properly and fairly assess the evidence, the Ontario Court of Appeal heard today. Defence lawyer Clayton Ruby was making submissions on behalf of his client, Tony Dooley, convicted of second-degree-murder in the brutal beating death of his 7-year-old son, Randal Dooley, on Sept. 25, 1998. His wife, Marcia Dooley, Randal’s stepmother, was also convicted of second-degree murder.

Evidence at trial showed that Randal Dooley was beaten to death by Marcia Dooley. Tony Dooley did nothing to stop his wife from repeatedly beating his son.  Randal was found to have 13 cracked ribs, a lacerated liver and a tooth that had been smashed into his stomach. He was covered in hundreds of bruises, scars and fresh wounds.

The parents were each sentenced to life in prison — Marcia Dooley to serve at least 18 years before being eligible for parole and Tony Dooley to serve 13 before becoming eligible. Marcia and Tony Dooley are both appealing their April 18, 2002, convictions and requesting a new trial on the basis that Superior Court Justice Eugene Ewaschuk made numerous errors at the trial, such as repeatedly referring to “poor, pitiful Randal.”

“This was a tragic and highly emotional case,” Ruby said today in front of a three-judge panel. And because there was already “hatred and disgust at these two accused black persons,” the judge needed to go out of his way to caution jurors not to let their best judgment be overidden by emotion. “That alliteration and other things in the jury address inflamed that jury,” Ruby said. A judge is also supposed to provide advice, not give “direction” to a jury, another area where Ewaschuk also crossed the line, Ruby said.

The Crown has yet to begin arguments. The case is scheduled for four days this week. But in its factum, it acknowledges that the trial judge’s repeated rerferences to “poor, pitiful Randal” were not necessary. “The references could not, however, have interefered with the jury’s fact-finding function or otherwise caused any prejudice in this case.” The Crown also contends that the judge’s language “was no stronger than what was warranted by the facts of the case.”

Outside the courthouse, Ruby acknowledged the public is unlikely to have a lot of sympathy, given the horrific circumstances of Randal’s life and death. “We provide an appeal because it’s good for us to have a justice system we can be proud of. It’s not for him, (Tony Dooley) it’s for us.”

These two Arguments for the Death Penalty should rot in hell for the rest of their lives.  They do not deserve to suck my tax dollars in prison.  And they don’t deserve to be seen as anything other than what they really are: Pure Evil.

Please read the comments section to learn more…

Thanks to a poster who wishes to remain anonymous, we now know who “LA” is from these illiterate posts: He’s Connie Nydam’s fiance. The poster sent me this link to Connie Nydam’s facebook page, along with links that take you right to pictures of LA, Caroline, and others who have polluted this site with their unintelligible rantings.  But I won’t post the links to her specific photos, aside from one below; people can peruse them yourselves.

Now, if LA is Connie’s fiance, then is it safe to infer that “teeni” of “teeni&LA” is Connie herself?  I’m actually starting to feel sorry for the kid, until I think about how many people’s lives she could’ve killed with her reckless, selfish, stupid behaviour each time she drinks and drives or drives with no concern for others.  As mentioned,  the only other link I will post is this one, which shows Connie bragging about talking to the COPS while pissed.  If anyone thought my assessment of her was unfair from the beginning, please check out this link and then tell me I’m wrong.  I truly hope she’ll smarten up and turn her life around, but at this point it doesn’t seem likely, especially when it’s highly doubtful that any of her friends will have the integrity and strength of character to do the right thing and tell her how self-destructive she’s being.  Will LA do that, or will he continue to defend Connie indefensible actions and choices?

1) I wrote before about this monster who watches child porn and denies he is a pedophile.  Even his lawyer admitted that he was unrepentant, but of course asked for house arrest.  So what did the Justice Argument for Birth Control give the monster, after admitting that he showed no remorse and was still a risk?  House arrest, of course.  This is Ontario/Canada…Yet, a single mom who steals bread to feed her family can face six months in jail.

2) This should scare the shit out of you: The most vulnerable among us often rely on Personal Support Workers to take care of them.  Well, this is a horror story about a fake school that the Ontario government has known about for a long time but has really done nothing about it. Thankfully, the Star did another expose that might actually cause the lazy, incompetent gov’t to do something about this Argument for Birth Control, who is also working illegally as a paralegal and sells potentially dangerous shampoo and other unlicensed products. Here’s a link to a video interview with this monster.

Please read the COMMENTS section below to read more about these scumbags.

I understand that the defence is just doing their job so I do not begrudge them.  Somebody has to defend these Arguments for Birth Control and Painful Castration.  But this animal still denies his horrific crime!  So he deserves far more punishment than he’s already received.  He cannot be rehabilitated and he will continue his crimes, guaranteed.  And if you don’t think that these sick bastards who view child porn are not causing irreparable damage to poor, innocent children, then you really know nothing.  Here’s the Star story:

Jail urged for teacher who viewed child porn — But losing his job, reputation has been punishment enough, defence argues (Jim Wilkes, Staff Reporter)

BARRIE–David Carswell should be sent to “real jail” to deter others from exploiting children in pornography, Crown counsel Anne Tierney has told Justice Nancy Dawson. The 55-year-old retired school teacher was in court yesterday for a sentencing hearing after his conviction in June for viewing and possessing child porn images on his home computer…Tierney said Carswell showed “pedophilic tendencies and sexual deviancy,” and has not shown remorse or admitted what he did was wrong. “He remains a risk,” she told court.

But defence lawyer David Wilcox urged Dawson not to put Carswell behind bars because a jail term “would smack of punishment. {AND THAT IS WRONG BECAUSE???} “His life is in tatters,” Wilcox said, quoting from a letter of support from a church minister. {A MINISTER IS SUPPORTING A PEDOPHILE…WOW, WHAT A SURPRISE...} He said Carswell’s arrest in 2005 has cost him a 29-year teaching career, most of his future pension and his status in the community. “It is hard to conceive we could punish him much more,” Wilcox said. {I CAN THINK OF SEVERAL WAYS…}

Wilcox, who suggested Carswell be put under house arrest, conceded his client has “never acknowledged his guilt or accepted his responsibility.” He said Carswell has never sought help for his problem “because he doesn’t think he has one.” According to a pre-sentence report, Carswell is “in denial” that he has done anything wrong, Wilcox said. “He’s been caught; he’s already been punished enough.” {NO HE HASN’T. AND IF HE’S IN DENIAL, HE WILL NEVER CHANGE. HE’S A SICK, EVIL BASTARD.}

Carswell faces as much as two years in a provincial jail. {AND THE SAD THING IS HE WILL NOT GET ANYTHING NEAR THIS PENALTY, WHICH IS FAR TOO SHORT.  I HAVE SEEN FIRSTHAND THE DAMAGE DONE TO THESE CHILDREN. THEY ARE SENTENCED TO A LIFETIME OF PAIN, SO TWO YEARS MEANS NOTHING.}

Carswell admitted in court he viewed child pornography on his home computer in an effort to help a young student he feared was being sexually exploited. He testified he didn’t know how hundreds of child porn pictures ended up downloaded on his computer, though he had viewed many images on it. In a rambling address to the court yesterday, Carswell did not express remorse and said he’d “never seen children as sexual objects.” He said he believed he could help his student by searching for images online. “I thought I could fix it myself,” he said. {CAN YOU SAY “DELUSIONAL”???}

I love when karma takes control of the scumbags of society.  The only problem is that my tax dollars are being wasted on trying to save this scumbag, rather than letting him die in the street.  Oh well…With our just-ass system, they’ll probably count the time he spends in hospital as “time served” when imposing an overly lenient sentence on the animal.  Here’s the Star story:

Teen struck by vehicle following robbery (Jaspreet Tambar & Alexandra Posadzki — Staff Reporters)

A 17-year-old male was taken to hospital with life-threatening injuries Friday night after a robbery in the Victoria Park and Lawrence Ave. E. area.  The teen was allegedly one of two who robbed the R J Food Market Convenience store on Victoria Park Ave., near Arncliffe Cres., around 8:30 p.m.  “They were both wearing masks. I could only see their eyes,” says Kaan Liu, owner of the convenience store, who was present with his wife and several other customers at the time. “One of them had a silver gun. He jumped over the counter and took the money.”

The two suspects seized around $150 from the cash register. As they fled across the street, Liu witnessed the 17-year-old get struck by a car while the other suspect escaped. The injured teen was transported to hospital in life-threatening condition. Police are still searching for the second suspect, who is described as male, in his 20s, around 5-foot-8, 150-165 lbs. and wearing a black sweater, black pants and a black baseball cap. Police believe that the suspect is armed.

I think our schools have gone off the deep end when it comes to protecting/catering to children and their parents.  It may not be as bad as in some parts of the States, but man do we have some messed up decisions here and to the South.

For instance, some schools ban TAG because the act of “tagging” someone is considered “violent.”  Some schools have no competitive sports so that no students lose any “self esteem” if they don’t win. Some schools refuse to use the term, “Hallow’een” because of the “religious” connotations (and thus call it “black and orange day”…seriously…. Some schools refuse to make any mention of Christmas, yet they have no problem with Ramadan or other religious events.  And the list goes on and on.

So some may think it’s crazy to arrest a group of 17 year olds who did something that has happened for many years: they used “paddles” to spank a couple of grade niners.  Then they drew sexual words/pictures on their faces.  All fun and games, right?  Wrong.  Hazing has no place in sports, school, or anywhere else.  Yeah, it’s tradition, but in this civilized country we’ve outlawed many “traditions”–many of which some barbaric countries still perform.

Especially these days, where being taken by a bunch of older kids, thrown in a van, and driven to the woods can end in MURDER or serious physical and sexual assaults–as has happened many times throughout Canad over the years–these 17 year-olds should know better.  They thus deserve to suffer some serious consequences.  Do they need to go to jail?  Probably not.  But they need to learn some kind of lesson for sure.

I wish I were making this stuff up.  But I can’t hit my head enough times to bring my IQ down to the level of IQ needed to write like this. It’s so pathetic it deserves its own thread.  And no, it’s not “just the way kids today write.”  I know many kids younger than this one (I’m just guessing she’s around Connie’s age, so let’s place her at 16-19 years old to be safe) who know how to communicate properly.   The problem is that the parents of these kids let them spend all their time EMailing, MSGing and texting, rather than learning how to read and write properly.

And no, I’m not being too harsh on this kid or others like her.   Just ask yourself, what kind of job do you think all of these kids are going to get?  And how many are going to get arrested or bring a kid in the world that they are going to ruin…and ruin society in the process?  The numbers are not pretty.

This kid represents so much that is wrong with yout today.  If she were 9 or 10 I wouldn’t be as worried, but like I wrote above, let’s infer that she’s at least 16, probably 18.  Pathetic:

1) dnt let me catch yu wif connie’s name in ur shit again u dnt noe her so dont talk bout her

2) honestly ya’ll shouldnt be talkin bout someone u dnt noee caroline is stickin up for connie cuz there frns and u noe what talkin bout connie is da last thing u guys should have in ur mind i dnt care if u have something negative to say keep it in ur heads and stop talkin shit bout ppl lik this on da internet so get real cuz its gonna catch up to u so dnt every but carolines name in ur shit or connies name in ur shit cuz ur waste styll